Syllabus Design
Group 3
Ball State University
Group Member
|
Task
|
Commented On
|
Emily Sheperd
|
Introduction and reflection
| Group 4 |
Christina Guy
|
Rationale
| Group 4 |
Jennifer Murphy
|
Syllabus Design
| Group 4 |
Megan Brown
|
Table 1
| Group 1 |
Introduction
We are going to design a syllabus for a workshop entitled Importance and Role of Relationships in Learning. The purpose of this workshop is to show how relationships affect the learning process. New adjunct faculty of Ivy Tech are required to attend the workshop, and community members who are interested in the subject are also welcome if there is additional space. This is a CEU eligible workshop. The objectives of this workshop are to introduce adjunct professors to relational learning, specifically the roles of facilitator-learner relationships, learner-learner relationships, and learner-self relationships; understand the different needs of relational and autonomous learners and methods that can be used to meet those needs; and adapt a lesson plan to better address the needs of relational and autonomous learners.
Rationale
Our group is focusing on relationships in learning. We are going to use the main ideas of this concept to frame our syllabus design. Our three main ideas include the importance of learner-facilitator, learner-learner, and learner-self relationships. The syllabus will focus on activities and strategies that will create an environment that promotes these various relationships in learning.
We will focus on our first idea, the learner-facilitator relationship, during the first part of our training program. The learner-facilitator relationship is the primary context within which learning occurs (Mackeracher, 2004). The morning session of the program will start with an icebreaker, two truths and a lie about the instructor and participant’s teaching experiences. This will invite learners to break out of their shell, become comfortable with one another, and learn about the instructor and their peers. We intend for the instructor’s participation in the icebreaker to spark the learner-facilitator relationship. According to Smith (2001), showing realness with mentors and students facilitates meaningful learning. Teachers are more effective when they express real feelings and can simply be themselves. A lecture will follow examining the three main themes of relationships in learning and will include a section on how to incorporate the theories into a lesson plan. The lecture will include PowerPoint, videos, handouts, and a quiz to determine if the participants are relational or autonomous learners. Following the lecture will be a time of sharing within the large group setting. The aim of the ice breaker, lecture with it’s multiple components, and large group sharing is to help create trust within the learner-facilitator relationship, which will allow the facilitator to modify the course to best meet the needs of the students.
After learning about the three main ideas of relationships in learning and how to incorporate these theories into a lesson plan, our next portion of the day will take place. The morning session will come to a close and participants will be given time to reflect alone on what they have learned and modify their lesson plans to meet the needs of relational and autonomous learners. The aim of this activity is to accommodate autonomous learners by allowing them to take time to themselves to complete the activity. Autonomous learners value opportunities to think and contribute more introspectively (Mackeracher, 2004). Therefore, an option to work alone will meet that need. Although some participants may choose to work in pairs or groups for this activity, especially relational learners, handouts from the lecture will help guide lesson plan modifications, along with additional resources to further help those participants that prefer to work alone.
After the participants have had an adequate amount of time to reflect on the lecture, modify their lesson plans as needed, and had lunch, our afternoon activities will begin. In the afternoon session, participants will be divided into small groups and encouraged to share how they changed and updated their lesson plans. The aim of this activity is to accommodate relational learners, or those that prefer to work interdependently. As Gergen said, “Learning is social and does not take place in isolation” (as cited in Ticknor, Cavendish, 2015). Sharing their modifications in a small group environment will allow the participants to provide feedback for each other; a handout of questions will also be given to the groups to further facilitate the small group work. This time in small groups also gives participants an opportunity to reflect and discuss highlights of the training program and share their thoughts on the important takeaways of the day.
After this time of reflection, modification of their own lesson plans and group discussion, participants will complete an evaluation of the training program. The aim of this activity is to accommodate autonomous learners and promote the learner-self relationship. The evaluation form will also allow us to make any necessary adjustments to the program in the future to better meet the needs of the participants. The facilitator will also discuss how evaluations demonstrate the necessity of self-reflection and modifications on behalf of the facilitator. This further deepens the trust within the learner-facilitator relationship.
Syllabus
Importance and Role of Relationships in Learning
Description
A one-day workshop offered four times a year, prior to the start of a semester. This workshop addresses the importance and role relationships play in effective learning and how to modify and facilitate lesson plans to meet the needs of both autonomous and relational learners. This workshop is required for newly hired Ivy Tech adjunct staff, but is also open to any educators within the community seeking increased knowledge, skills and/or required CEU credits. Participants should read the syllabus prior to attending as there is a pre-assignment to prepare and bring to the workshop.
Location
Ivy Tech Community College-Noblesville Campus
300 North 17th Street
Noblesville, IN 46060
Ivy Tech Community College-Noblesville Campus
300 North 17th Street
Noblesville, IN 46060
Phone- 317-921-4300
Dates Offered (attend only one date-each date has same content)
2018-2019 Calendar Year
2018-2019 Calendar Year
Friday, June 1, 2018
Friday, August 10, 2018
Friday, January 11, 2019
Friday, January 11, 2019
Friday, May 31, 2019
Time
Registration: 7:30 am
Workshop: 8:00 am - 3:30 pm
Lunch (on your own): 11:45 am - 1:00 pm
Registration: 7:30 am
Workshop: 8:00 am - 3:30 pm
Lunch (on your own): 11:45 am - 1:00 pm
Workshop Objectives
- Gain a better understanding of the role they play in a learners ability to learn and the importance of building trust within...
- Learner-Facilitator Relationships
- Learner-Learner Relationships
- Learner-Self Relationships
- Gain a better understanding about what it means to be and teach relational and autonomous learners.
- Self-identify as either a relational or autonomous learner.
- Identify methods, ideas and activities to accommodate autonomous and relational learners.
- Ability to modify existing lesson plans in order to meet the needs of both relational and autonomous learners.
- Understand the importance of self-evaluation, peer idea sharing and adapting lesson plans.
Reading/Learning Materials
Website: Icebreaker Activities - https://www.icebreakers.ws/classroom-icebreakers
Website/Short Video: http://www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/linguafolio/5794?style=print (Think, Pair, Share)
Video: Differentiation in Teaching: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVRYSC8YyYA&feature=related
Handout: Quiz-Are you a relational or autonomous learner?
Handout: Activities to accommodate relational learners
Handout: Activities to accommodate autonomous learners
Handout: Guiding questions for activities
Assignments
- Prior to the workshop date, each participant must select a lesson plan to evaluate and discuss during the workshop. It is most beneficial if participants select a lesson plan they have previously taught that did not go as planned or expected.
- During the workshop, participants will take a survey to determine if they, themselves, are relational or autonomous learners.
- Time will be given during the day for participants to reflect on the content of the workshop and modify the previously selected lesson plan utilizing the ideas and theories discussed earlier in the day. Modifications should be completed by the conclusion of the lunch break.
Learning tools and methods
The facilitator of the workshop will use varying tools and methods in an attempt to meet the learning styles and needs of many and build trust in the room. The agenda of the day is structured with activities that both accommodate the relational and autonomous learners in attendance while also being an actual reflection of the theory and method being taught. Powerpoint, lecture, videos, and handouts are used to meet the needs of autonomous learners. An icebreaker activity, small group discussion, and large group discussion is used to accommodate relational learners.
Schedule of Topics
Main Theoretical Idea 1: Importance of Learner-Facilitator Relationships
Main Theoretical Idea 2: Importance of Learner-Learner Relationships
Main Theoretical Idea 3: Importance of Learner-Self Relationships
Lesson Plan Modification
Purpose of Evaluations
Class schedule/Contents of the activities
7:30-8:00 AM- Check in/Continental breakfast and coffee provided.
Morning Session
8:00-8:30 AM- Icebreaker Activity
Two truths and a lie about your teaching experience
Two truths and a lie about your teaching experience
Outline group expectations for sharing and feedback of others
8:30-9:15 AM- Lecture & Quiz
Three theoretical ideas
Three theoretical ideas
Definition of relational and autonomous learners
Quiz: Are you an autonomous or relational learner
9:15-9:45 AM- Large Group Discussion
Share results of quiz
9:45-9:55 AM- Break
9:55-10:45 AM- Lecture & Handouts
Lesson plan activities and modifications
Videos: 1. Think, Pair, Share
2. Differentiation in Teaching
10:45-11:15 AM- Large Group Discussion
Share pre-selected lesson plan with the group and reflection of why not successful
11:15-11:45 AM- Self Study
Take time to modify lesson plans to reflect theories and adaption to learners
11:45 AM-1:00 PM- Lunch
On your own- several options East on SR32 and also South on SR37
1:00-2:00 PM- Small Group Discussion, Teamwork and Reflection
2:00-2:45 PM- Large Group Discussion and Idea Sharing
2:45-3:00 PM- Lecture
Importance of evaluations
3:00-3:15 PM- Evaluation of Workshop
3:15-3:30 PM- Turn in evaluations and pick up Certificate of Completion
Grading Criteria/Standards
It is assumed that those attending this workshop are knowledgeable, capable educators looking to gain further insight and skills in new topic areas. Participation in all activities is expected in order to receive a Certificate of Completion.
Attendance Policy
Ivy Tech Staff: New hires to Ivy Tech Community College are expected to attend this workshop day, in it’s entirety, prior to their first scheduled semester. However, deferments are granted in extenuating circumstances, allowing staff to attend the next scheduled workshop date. Registration in this course will be completed during each new hire’s human resources orientation meeting and completion certificates are logged in personnel files.
Other Educators: Attendance of the entire day is expected to obtain CEU* certificate and credit.
Certificates of completion will be distributed at the conclusion of the workshop. Early departure from the workshop is not permitted and certificates are not handed out early.
*The Indiana Department of Education Board and Indiana Professional Licensing Agency has approved this organization to provide Category I Continuing Education. However, licensees must judge the workshop’s relevance to their professional practice.*
Reflection
Highlights
The highlight of this assignment was working on Skype together to create our workshop. It allowed us to have a good conversation about how we are currently using relationships in learning in our own lives and what it would look like in “a perfect world”. In addition, the meeting established trust with each other and built a positive relationship that ultimately resulted in accountability to each other and a shared desire to do well on the assignment. We discovered that all members of our group have a general mission of helping people succeed in their academic/career future, and we could all see a workshop like this benefiting our own work which made designing it much more exciting.
Process
To write this syllabus design, the group established roles and due dates for assignments. We set up a Skype meeting to delve further into exactly what we wanted our workshop to look like, pulled in resources already utilized due to our research on the topic, and set out a very, very rough draft. After that meeting, each person cleaned up and finished off their section. The group reviewed the document throughout the process on Google Drive to catch errors or update things in real-time, and after a final group review and sign off, it was posted on the blog.
Table 1. Summary of syllabus design
Aims you wish to achieve in your design
|
Main theoretical ideas
|
Main activities in the syllabus
|
Main methods/tools in the syllabus
| |
1.
|
Creating a trust relationship that allows facilitator to modify the course to best meet the needs of the students
|
Learner-Facilitator relationships are important to the learning process because they help to create an environment that is conducive to learning. The facilitator must understand how to build a relationship with the learner in order to help the learner achieve their overall goals in the course.
|
|
1. Powerpoint, videos, and handouts will give information on the importance of building relationships as well as the difference between an autonomous self-system and relational self-system. A quiz will also be given to determine whether the learner is more relational or autonomous in their self-system.
2. Two truths and a lie about my teaching experience will help to foster the trusting relationship needed between learner-facilitator and learner-learner throughout the workshop.
|
2.
|
Accommodating relational learners
|
Learner-Learner relationships within a course are important, especially to relational learners. Relational learners best learn by discussing and reflecting with their peers. In order to feel safe and able to share with peers in the first place, it is important to build a positive learner-learner relationship.
|
1. Each workshop participant will work in a small group to discuss their lesson plan adjustments. This will allow for relational learners to have the opportunity to collaborate with those amongst them.
2. Group reflection will occur over the lesson plan modifications that were made following the informational session on accommodating for both relational and autonomous selves.
|
1. Handout of questions to facilitate the small group work in order to help the groups stay on task and know what to discuss. The classroom can be arranged to allow groups to work together well so the small group discussion is successful.
2. Groups will discuss the highlights of the modifications they made on their lesson plans that they adjusted individually.
|
3.
|
Accommodating autonomous learners
|
Learner-Self relationships assist the learner in achieving intended outcomes, especially when one is an autonomous learner. Autonomous learners prefer to work individually and reflect on an experience on their own time.
|
|
1. Participants will have time on their own to adjust their lesson plans they brought. Handouts will be given to assist in the process of adjusting the lesson plan that has information presented during the workshop.
2. Post-workshop evaluation will be given to each participant. Discussion of the importance of evaluations will occur to show how they can be an important tool in not only building relationships but allowing for the autonomous self to thrive.
|
References
MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making sense of adult learning (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: University
of Toronto Press.
Smith, M. K. (2001). Relationships, learning, and education. Encyclopedia of Informal
Education. Retrieved from http://infed.org/mobi/relationship-learning-and-education/
Ticknor, A.S., Cavendish, L.M. (2015) Bonded relationships: supporting pre-service
teachers to develop confidence and competency as elementary literacy educators. Teacher Development. Retrieved from: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
A one day workshop is perfect before start of semester I feel 2 or more days can be a bit much. I like the idea of this workshop being offered to educators in the community. Various sign up days provide flexibility. I like how the workshops are designed to build relationships regardless if the student, facilitator or educator. A great idea to allow participants to select lesson plan before workshop. Great syllabus design!
ReplyDeleteThis is a great idea for new faculty who may or may not have much experience with adult education and pedagogy. Focusing on creating a trust relationship is important for students to feel they are in a safe environment, which is key to promote learning, in my opinion. I would say that many first year instructors would welcome any opportunity to enhance their instructional skills.
ReplyDeleteI also wonder if attenance at a conference during the first year of instruction might also help to expand on this approach.
While researching, I found this conference site: http://teachinglargeclasses.org/conference/index.php
I am interested in this as well!
Nice work on syllabus design and workshop approach. I hope you can share this with Ivy Tech for possible implementation. It would be beneficial.
I liked your syllabus design. It is tight and compact and to the point. I also work at Ivy Tech and as an adjunct faculty I think the content of your workshop is exactly what is needed in regards to the community college setting. Many of Ivy Tech's students are in constant crisis and learning to understand how to develop of a trust environment is so very important. My group also used a one day format for our workshop and I think there are a lot of benefits to a workshop designed like this. You can maximize attendance due to the timeliness of the workshop itself and the amount of energy expended over one day versus several. Thanks for the interesting syllabus design.
ReplyDeleteHello Group Three,
ReplyDeleteI really like how you offered and listed several dates for the training session. I also liked how your goals where clear and straightforward. Participants can determine what they can expect when attending the workshop. I also like the attached videos and the handouts. Great job providing participants with additional resources they can utilize. In addition, I believe the group did and excellent job creating a concise schedule for all activities.
Great syllabus.
I think this course would be a great workshop for faculty, facilitators, and group leaders to attend. Offering the course prior to the start of a semester would is definitely beneficial as it may help refresh/inspire faculty to incorporate certain aspects into their own teaching styles. The course would also be beneficial to those that are new to facilitating learning courses. Great work.
ReplyDeleteThis syllabus is great and sensible from the perspective of the faculty and the school. It benefits all parties. It is well organized and thorough while still not being so long to insult the intelligence of the attendees. Having multiple dates also shows foresight in providing opportunities for attendance. Great work!
ReplyDeleteMegan , Christina, Emily, and Jennifer,
ReplyDeleteThis is a very cohesive syllabus design. Each part of the paper is well connected. I also like your rationales, which clearly show your activities and the aims of the activities.
Suggestions:
1. Add more references to show the theoretical explanations of why you use certain activities, and how they relate to relationship in learning.
2. It is easy to design a workshop which directly address the content of relationship in learning. You can also consider about how to use relationship in learning as a framework to design a course, such as a business course.
Bo